That can be true with contracts if the winning bid ended up being that way with low salary and high SB. If the league is going to generate it's own contract terms, though, to me we'd want them to be structured in a way best overall for the health of the league. We have to make up some general numbers to apply to these situations and contract structures, so best I think to contemplate the best way of doing that. While other players on the open market could end up with different looking contracts, the ones written by the league I think should be setup in a way deemed most beneficial overall.Jared A wrote:One thing I will say in defense is this...
There are teams that still sign players to next to no salary, huge signing bonuses long term, and then trade them. So, it's not uncommon to have players in the league making next to nothing after being traded.
If a 200% signing bonus doesn't slow them down from trading them, then let them trade. I've never been a supporter to limiting any type of trade.
LTC Restrictions
Re: LTC Restrictions
Official Statement from the Commissioner's Office