They are based on current contracts given out by other GMs because why would a player take less than what the market says they are worth?Crossway92 wrote:LTC values should come down for non QB positions, imo
You can thank your fellow GMs for that
They are based on current contracts given out by other GMs because why would a player take less than what the market says they are worth?Crossway92 wrote:LTC values should come down for non QB positions, imo
tino38 wrote:They are based on current contracts given out by other GMs because why would a player take less than what the market says they are worth?Crossway92 wrote:LTC values should come down for non QB positions, imo
You can thank your fellow GMs for that
Amen. The only reason you would give LTC to a player is because he might get paid more in FA. If you're paying someone that amount who would get less then that in the open market then let him go to FA and outbid everyone else.Ben C. wrote:This issue has been discussed ad nausea over the last several years. I vote we table it this year so we can focus on other things.
If you want to see discussions about LTCs, dig up the previous discussions.
Similar to the NFL and as you describe, where you can choose tender level to get compensation if you decide to not match a deal.Tmiller wrote:This is more of a question than idea, how does RFA work here? Tender level and compensation if no match, or just the opportunity to match? Jw thanks