Search found 9 matches
- Fri Mar 31, 2023 11:07 am
- Forum: Announcements and Rules Discussion
- Topic: 2023 Off-Season Update
- Replies: 21
- Views: 76542
- Tue Mar 28, 2023 4:39 pm
- Forum: Announcements and Rules Discussion
- Topic: 2023 RULES: Bids
- Replies: 15
- Views: 198969
Re: 2023 RULES: Bids
Don't tell me who I should and shouldn't LTC lol
- Mon Mar 27, 2023 6:16 pm
- Forum: Announcements and Rules Discussion
- Topic: 2023 RULES: Bids
- Replies: 15
- Views: 198969
Re: 2023 RULES: Bids
Backup Qbs rated lower than 70 are worth a LTC value of 21M. Seems a little high?
- Mon Mar 27, 2023 5:31 pm
- Forum: Announcements and Rules Discussion
- Topic: 2023 RULES: Veterans on Practice Squad
- Replies: 6
- Views: 26984
Re: 2023 RULES: Veterans on Practice Squad
If everyone is eligible, I wonder if we shouldn't shorten the waiver matching time to 2-3 days?
- Tue Mar 07, 2023 1:38 pm
- Forum: Fanulation - Football Simulation Software
- Topic: Simulation Adjustments for 2023
- Replies: 16
- Views: 155523
Re: Simulation Adjustments for 2023
Just a few things I've noticed about the sim, In playoffs for qbs, they'll have an INT in their stats but won't throw one in the game. Players on IR getting credit for sacks on their bye weeks. I've also noticed sacks seem to almost always happen in the 1st quarter/half of games and rarely in the 2n...
- Sun Apr 10, 2022 2:43 pm
- Forum: Announcements and Rules Discussion
- Topic: 2022 RULES: Multi-Positional Impact
- Replies: 20
- Views: 200755
Re: 2022 RULES: Multi-Positional Impact
RB's should definitely not have their full ratings used as receiving rates. They are not rated that high for their receiving talents. Basically I agree with what Larry said. Using a percentage of their rates might be the solution? And I'm not sure if setting a catch or target limit is the best solu...
- Sun Apr 10, 2022 11:03 am
- Forum: Announcements and Rules Discussion
- Topic: 2022 RULES: Multi-Positional Impact
- Replies: 20
- Views: 200755
Re: 2022 RULES: Multi-Positional Impact
RB's should definitely not have their full ratings used as receiving rates. They are not rated that high for their receiving talents. Basically I agree with what Larry said. Using a percentage of their rates might be the solution? And I'm not sure if setting a catch or target limit is the best solut...
- Mon Apr 04, 2022 2:18 pm
- Forum: Announcements and Rules Discussion
- Topic: 2022 Off-Season Update
- Replies: 53
- Views: 414023
Re: 2022 Off-Season Update
I did the same. It wasn't clear
- Thu Mar 17, 2022 6:54 pm
- Forum: Football Fans
- Topic: Prospective GM Wait List
- Replies: 580
- Views: 2385456
Re: Prospective GM Wait List
If you need to fill the league, I'd take New England in the EFFL