I don't really have any issues but I'd rather have free agency before the draft. So if draft is pushed back slightly, that works

I would agree with the QB adjustment issue. I have had games with a max advantage that has not played out. I think this is something to address because those max advantages are things we have done in building our teams to make up for lesser QB play. So if I dont have a QB who throws it 25+ times a g...

RB's should definitely not have their full ratings used as receiving rates. They are not rated that high for their receiving talents. Basically I agree with what Larry said. Using a percentage of their rates might be the solution? And I'm not sure if setting a catch or target limit is the best solu...

Again, I don't think they need full wr impact but rather that they should still factor in to the wr grade. Ekeler was targeted 94 times, same as Najee Harris. He also only ran the ball around 200 times...similar to Aaron Jones. I feel you are hung up on how many times they line up as a WR which is t...

Just went through all the teams snap counts and 12 RB's had more snaps at the slot and wide positions than Austin Ekeler. Edmonds (94), Patterson (162), Freeman (78), Mixon (82), Zeke Elliott (85), Jones GB (92), Hines (124), Henderson (106), Michel (85), Kamara (119), Harris 102 and McKinnon (99)....

Id be able to go through some spread sheets and dig into players positional status. I think we just need some guidelines as to what the thresholds are to keep someone say T/G eligible (and is there a difference between being T/G or G/T in the system when filling out the Oline...) I said n another th...

This is something Ive brought up in the past as well, tying to figure out what the standard is for getting a player the RB/WR designation. Personally, we may want to consider a threshhold of receptions on the year that gets the RB to factor into the WR grade, because for the team that player is on, ...

interesting spread of votes on all the options here. I think others have voiced it as well but I can see people taking advantage of the voidable years. What if we put more limitations on that? Say we add the extra restructure, which seems to be a favorite option, but only allow one of our 3 restruct...

you can post these in the FFFL Forum and chat. As well as in your trade block on your team page

Here's a example of a player that just signed. Now when Chicago matches, they have a good player on the cheap for 3 years while saving $2.6 mil against the cap this year. No player would ever sign that offer sheet. • CHI Ward, Charvarius |CB| Restricted FA 2nd Round Compensation $3.384mil Signed a ...