2013 RULES: RFAs to UFAs

Post Reply

Should teams have the usual advantages for signing own UFAs for RFAs they decide not to tender?

No, don't change - For RFAs, teams must either offer a tender or cut the player.
13
34%
Yes, change - Allow another option for either tendering RFA or just making him UFA with same home team advantages to re-sign as all other UFAs if a team thinks he's not worthy of tender amount but still wants to try to re-sign for less.
25
66%
 
Total votes: 38

Goodell
Posts: 3843
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2008 3:44 am
Contact:

2013 RULES: RFAs to UFAs

Post by Goodell »

Currently, if you have a free agent with 3 years or less experience (a restricted free agent) you have to tender an offer to the player which allows you to match any offers on that player or receive compensation based upon the amount tendered. If you decide the player isn't worth any tender amount, you currently have to cut the player and make him an unrestricted free agent on the open market.

First-round tender $2.879 million
Second-round tender $2.023 million
Original round tender $1.323 million
Right of first refusal tender $1.323 million

There have been suggestions to also allow another option of letting that RFA become unrestricted but without the team having to cut the player, thus keeping him with that home team affiliation and allowing his original team to have the usual unlimited bidding rights they have for all their other UFAs with expired contracts.

In the past, it didn't seem like a big deal and if a player wasn't worth the smallest tender then the thinking was he probably wasn't a player the team had interest in keeping anyway so they should just cut him if not worth minimum tender.

However, as tender amounts have risen over the years and teams becoming even more strategic about every available roster spot, it's probably not difficult to adjust the programming to allow another choice for RFAs (to have them be UFAs with team affiliation) and I don't believe it's against any NFL rules and is somewhat seen in reality where this year we've seen at least one RFA not be tendered and re-sign for less than the tender amount with original team.

Not a huge change here, just would allow teams an extra opportunity to keep young players even if they deem them not worthy of an RFA tender by giving them unlimited bidding rights for the RFA turned UFA.

An argument against it might be the lowest tender is just "rights of first refusal" which is essentially what we have anyway with a team's own UFAs with the unlimited bidding for keeping your own, so a team would be getting essentially that rights of first refusal still (keeping him as their own UFA) without having to put in that lowest tender amount.
Official Statement from the Commissioner's Office
charlie813brown
Posts: 132
Joined: Sat Aug 23, 2008 11:08 pm

Re: 2013 RULES: RFAs to UFAs

Post by charlie813brown »

I think right of first refusal and unlimited bids are not the same thing. First refusal means after bidding has stopped, you can agree to that price or not. But home team bidding, means i have to bid, which can be used to drive the price up by other teams.
Cory H
GM of Baltimore Ravens CFFL (Total - 43-53)
2008 - 5-11
2009 - 9-7
2010 - 10-6 (AFC Wild Card)
2011 - 10-6
2012 - 1-15 (Rebuilding year)
2013 - 8-8
tino38
Posts: 1137
Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2009 5:39 pm

Re: 2013 RULES: RFAs to UFAs

Post by tino38 »

Some guys would much rather just bid on someone in FA rather than using a RFA on someone
BRFL Saints (31-20) (3-0)
- NFCS Champ: 23’
- NFC Champ: 23’
- SB Champ 23’
AFFL Patriots (97-82) (8-4)
-AFCE Champ: 16', 22’, 23’
-AFC Champ: 22’
-SB Champ: 22’
DFFL Jets - SB Champ 21’ & 22’
FFFL Jets - SB Champ 17’ & 18’
Post Reply