Potential Future Rule Change

Onyxgem
Posts: 758
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2007 3:32 pm

Re: Potential Future Rule Change

Post by Onyxgem »

Shagg wrote:If your active and you participate why should you be gone for having fun with the team you inherited. I think it's a crappy idea and really what is the point? Your going to have bad teams and good teams. Punishing owners who are active is stupid imo. Of course this could be looked upon as bias as I haven't had a winning record yet. Still the threat of being booted from the league is a bit unnerving. I look forward to this every season starting with the draft it makes the year go by much quicker, no way I will resubmit my name if I'm released from duties to take on another team in 2 or 3 seasons. The possibility of losing good active owners doesn't fly with me.

I agree here 100%.....
sportznut
Posts: 1149
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2007 5:09 pm

Re: Potential Future Rule Change

Post by sportznut »

I like how my idea was completely hijacked in this thread.
AFFL- Raiders
MLBSA- Tigers
WLSB- Marlins
Smooth Glitch
Posts: 134
Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2009 12:23 pm

Re: Potential Future Rule Change

Post by Smooth Glitch »

I wouldn't say it was hijacked. It has obviously illustrated there is division on the issue which is good as it warrants consideration for rule change. Commish?
Houston Texans AFFL
Reg. season: 91-87 (51.1%)
2012: 8-8
2013: 10-6
2014: 8-8
2015: 12-4 Playoffs:1-1
2016: 9-7
2017: 2-14
2018: 5-11
2019: 8-8
2020: 12-4
2021: 7-10
2022: 10-7 Playoffs 0-1
AFC South Champ: 2015
Post Reply